Yep, according to various studies undertaken by Scientists
in the UK and Brazil, it was concluded that people engaging in 3 or 4 times of
sexual intercourse per week, earned approximately 4.5% more than those
individuals who had sex less than three times a week. See post here : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/11553243/People-who-have-sex-twice-a-week-earn-4.5pc-more-than-those-who-dont.html.
One can take the results of these surveys with a pinch of
salt and weigh the information objectively. Firstly, it’s a widely known theory
that people who lead active sex lives are more content and happy in their
lives. See this post http://www.healthline.com/health-slideshow/ways-sex-helps-you-live-longer.
They are more confident than the person leading an average or below average sex
life. Their attitudes in their work environment reflect a more positive tone
than their average colleague.
This assumption stems directly from the fact that during
sexual intercourse a string of happy hormones, i.e. Oxytocin, Serotonin, etc.
are released into the body. So it stands to reason that the more sex one has,
the more happy hormones one releases, and the more one is content with the
world around you. Pair this up with a
situation where such an individual loves their job and work environment and you
have a consistently above average performer.
The study mentioned is basically based on the trends of
individuals mentioned above. This is where it gets tricky; the objective of the
exercise was to ascertain the earning levels of individuals who have more sex
than those who are less active. The problem with the survey is that it cannot
be ascertained whether the exercise was thoroughly exhaustive of any other
theories for people earning 4.5% more than others. For example, did an individual with drive, high
performance, motivation, ambition, but little sexual activity, actually earn
less than a person with a high sex life, whose performance may not have been on
par? You may argue that the person with the active sex life would have
performed in his job better than the person with a less active sex life, based
on the theory in the previous section. The results of the survey also do not
suggest the ratio of people who performed very well in their jobs were ALL
individuals with a higher than average sex life. It only suggests that
individuals who had healthy sex lives earned higher than those who didn’t!
So unless we are assured that the survey was thoroughly
exhaustive of all probabilities, I’m not convinced this theory is
conclusive. I may be pissing up the
wrong tree, but that’s my take and I’m sticking to it!
Wow, thats surely exquisite to recognize the fact and I am positive you will also love my article written here dr. ryan shephardapproximately Hope so you will love to provide me a go-to.
ReplyDelete